Unfair Retirement: Ex-Directors Threaten Legal Action Against FIRS

Former directors of the Federal Inland Revenue Services (FIRS), who were recently retired by the board of the nation’s revenue agency, have threatened to go to court to ask for the reversal of their retirements which they said did not follow due process.
The former directors said they were unjustly retired as the sections of Human Resources Policy and Programmes on which their retirement was based on, has been replaced with another rule put in place in 2016 by President Muhammadu Buhari.
They also alleged that the people that were appointed to replace them are contract staff allegedly brought in by the Executive Chairman and not civil servants.
The board of the FIRS had on March 2020, approved the retirement of all directors, who had served at least eight years with the
organisation. It also approved the appointment of four Coordinating Directors and two Group Leads in an acting capacity.
A Memorandum from the Office of Executive Chairman of FIRS, to this effect, which was issued on March 24, 2020, titled SUBJECT:
NOTIFICATION addressed to all the staff of the organization and signed by the Executive Chairman, Muhammad M. Nami, reads as follows:
“This is to formerly notify you that the Board of Federal Inland Revenue Service at its Emergency Meeting No.2 held on 20th of March 2020, approved the retirement of all directors who have served eight years and above as directors in the Service in line with Para 10.1(a)(iii) of HRPP. We wish them well in their future endeavours.
“The Board also gave its approval for the appointment of four Coordinating Directors in acting capacity and two Group Leads for six months once…”
Also, a statement by Director of Communications and Liaison Department
of the organisation, Abdullahi Ahmad, who made the announcement to the media, said “The FIRS Board took this decision at its emergency meeting No. 2. held on Friday, March 20, 2020, during which it also approved the retirement of all directors who have served for eight years and above as directors in the Service, in line with Para
10.1(a)(iii) of Human Resources Policy and Programmes of the FIRS statute.”
It could be recalled  that  the limitation of tenure of directors and permanent secretaries in the federal civil service to two terms of four years  was meant to create vacancies at the highest level of civil service had been  introduced by the President Olusegun Obasenjo administration in 2004.
Essentially, the policy was aimed at ensuring that most civil servants that are qualified are able to attain directorship as well as
permanent secretary status in the civil service.
As part of the effort to reform the civil service, Obasanjo’s administration had created the Bureau of Public Service Reforms (BPSR) on February 4, 2004 to advise the regime on how to go about the reform process.
The Bureau, it was learned, was saddled with the mandate of stopping the policy in the civil service, which allowed young workers who enjoyed rapid promotion to the rank of directors or permanent secretaries from over-staying that resulted in the career stagnation of older civil servants. The reforms spearheaded by the BSPR introduced policies of four years of two terms for directors as well as permanent secretaries even if such directors and permanent secretaries were less than 60 years and had served below 35 years in the civil service at the end of their terms.
It was argued that there were civil servants that had been directors or permanent secretaries for more than 13 years. This, it was argued was clogging the system as those that were due for promotion to the
post of directors were not promoted due lack of vacancies at the top echelon of the service.
But, according to the aggrieved ex-directors, in 2016, President Muhammad Buhari, authorised the ‘suspension’ of the tenure limitation without advancing any reason behind the move, and wondered why the
FIRS board did not take this into consideration before retiring them. They quoted  a circular which was contained in a  Federal Establishment circulars  2011-2016, HSCF/428/S.1/139, dated June 20,
2016, titled  SUSPENSION OF TENURE POLICY IN THE FEDERAL SERVICE,
signed by the then  Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, Winifred Oyo-Ita as the extant rule guiding the tenure of the federal
civil service
The circular reads: “With reference to letter No. SH/COS/100/A/1462 dated 17th June, 2016, I write to convey Mr. President’s directive that Tenure Policy in the Federal Civil Service is suspended with immediate effect.
2. This is for the attention of concerned for compliance.”
According to the aggrieved FIRS former directors, there has not been any directive either from the Presidency or HSCF upturning the extant directive from Mr. President, hence they insist there is more to their retirement than the HRPP cited by the organisation’s board as the reason for their retirement.
One of the directors, who does not want to be mentioned for now, said that the group had approached an Abuja-based human rights lawyer to advise its members on the line of action to be taken against
the Board of FIRS.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

%d bloggers like this: